The reporting of observational research studies in dermatology journals: a literature-based study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of reporting in observational studies in dermatology. DATA SOURCES Five dermatology journals-the Archives of Dermatology, the British Journal of Dermatology, the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, and Acta Dermato-Venereologica. STUDY SELECTION Cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies published as original articles during the period January 2005 through December 2007. Studies were identified with a literature search of PubMed combining the journal title and the term epidemiological studies (free text) and by hand searching all of the issues of each journal to identify relevant articles. DATA EXTRACTION All articles were extracted by 2 reviewers independently using standardized checklists based on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations. DATA SYNTHESIS The number and proportion of reported STROBE items were analyzed for each article. The proportion of studies with good reporting for each item was also assessed. RESULTS A total of 138 articles were included and analyzed. Reporting quality was very mixed. Key areas that were infrequently reported included sample size calculations (n = 10 [7%]), missing data (n = 8 [6%]), losses to follow-up (n = 17 [12%]), and statistical methods (n = 19 [14%]). Only 13 studies (9%) explained the role of funders in the research. The quality of reporting was similar across study designs for "critical" questions with the exception of reporting of participant details, which was better reported in cohort studies (96%) compared with cross-sectional (80%) and case-control (70%) studies. CONCLUSIONS It is difficult to judge the quality of dermatological research unless it is reported well. This study has identified a clear need to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies in dermatology. We recommend that dermatology journals adopt the STROBE criteria.
منابع مشابه
معرفی دستورالعمل ارتقاء گزارشدهی مطالعات مشاهدهای در اپیدمیولوژی
Background and Objective: Studies in the health sciences is comprised of observational and intervention. A major part of health sciences research has been allocated to the observational studies. Designing and doing studies based on scientific guidelines that include the entire process, leads to studies validation and also results can be generalized to the community. Thus, for standardizing ...
متن کاملبررسی کیفیت گزارش نتایج مطالعات کوهورت قبل از صدور بیانیه STROBE
Background & Objectives: Observational studies are not often reported in detail and clear enough, so that assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of these studies is not straightforward. To improve the reporting of observational studies, a checklist of items called ‘Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology’ (STROBE) was developed by some experts in October 2007. T...
متن کاملEvaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement
BACKGROUND Observational studies are the most frequently published studies in literature. When randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted because of ethical or practical considerations, an observational study design is the first choice. The STROBE Statement (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) was developed to provide guidance on how to adequately report ...
متن کاملReporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review
BACKGROUND Observational studies dominate the surgical literature. Statistical adjustment is an important strategy to account for confounders in observational studies. Research has shown that published articles are often poor in statistical quality, which may jeopardize their conclusions. The Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature (SAMPL) guidelines have been published to ...
متن کاملکیفیت گزارش مطالعات کوهورت پرستاری و مامایی براساس بیانیه STROBE
Background & Aim: Transparent and appropriate reporting of studies facilitates critical appraisal, application and combination of findings. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, is a relatively new statement in order to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The present study aimed to assess the quality of reporting nu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Archives of dermatology
دوره 146 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010